Looking further into literature to help me to understand my inquiry more, is enabling me to see why Performing Arts is not necessarily present within primary education. I am still on the look out for literature relating directly to Primary education rather than Secondary, but the majority of text appears to relate to education in general. I think this will still be a source of information which will help develop my inquiry.
This piece of literature discusses dance as an interdisciplinary learning tool within schools. I also saw this discussed in another piece of literature which I have looked at, where it was said that 'teachers can use dance as a unique vehicle for integrating teaching and learning across curricula'. (Hanna, p65, 1999). As my inquiry is currently looking into the basis of performing arts providing disciplinary skills within education, I think that it is beneficial to also look at why dance specifically can be seen more as a tool, to incorporate learning within other subjects.
Dance in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning- Alison M Rhodes
'Dance if often positioned in contrast to more "academic" disciplines.'
Rhodes immediately begins by making a comparison of dance with other disciplines which are seen as 'academic' within schools. I agree that this is very often the case, and by contrast is not a discipline in itself and used within Physical Education and therefore not as common as other subjects, as Rhodes says "dance is not valued as a discipline in its own right". (Rhodes, 2006). So this poses the question of: Why is dance not seen in its own right and therefore made compulsory within primary schools?
'When taught at all, it is often used for the purpose of increasing student engagement or advancing understanding in another subject'
I think it would be a good source of research to ask current primary school teachers whether they use dance for student engagement? I would't make an argument that dance should be used to increase student engagement as Rhodes suspects is sometimes the case here. From my own experience I would say that yes, dance and performing arts can engage students, and therefore they can learn from these disciplines, however, it depends on many factors. These factors include: gender, confidence and previous experience. I also think that if a student already has an interest in Performing Arts then they are more likely to put in the effort and achieve learning successfully. In contrast I think that if a student does not have an interest then the effort is not there and therefore neither is the learning.
For dance to be used to advance understanding in another subject, I can imagine would be a suitable reason for teachers to introduce dance. Although I have used cross-curricular links within my dance sessions in primary schools, I wouldn't necessarily agree that this has always developed the understanding of the linked subject. For example, I recently used the solar system as a stimulus to create a dance piece within a Year 5 class. I wasn't aiming to make this educational as such, but more to help the students develop ideas and creativity from a subject that they were already familiar with. This was a really effective tool to use and enabled the students to stay focused on the task I had set.
Discussing interdisciplinary education: 'provides unique opportunities for learning about dance as well as through dance'
These unique opportunities are ones that I have seen myself. As a professional dancer I feel that I have provided 'unique' sessions that students may not have had the experience of previously. Whilst most Primary School 'dance' lessons are taught by their class teacher, the students that I have had the pleasure of teaching have been taught by someone who has had intense and professional training and has been lucky enough to gain professional experience within the industry.
Where dance is used within interdisciplinary learning, it exposes this discipline to students in a way they may have not experienced before. This is providing the 'unique opportunity' which I think Rhodes talks about here. And whilst this can create an interesting way for students to learn, I think it could sometimes take away certain aspects of Dance that may only come from a specific lesson dedicated to the learning of the Performing Arts. At the same time we could look into the skills that are being learnt here; could these skills be seen a transferable skills from one subject to another?
This quote above, helped me to understand the definition of interdisciplinary studies.
'To validate its place within schooling, dance is often asked the play the role of supporting what are viewed as more "academic" disciplines'
Why is dance sometimes used as the supporting study? Why can we not use dance simply in its own right? I think this could be a useful question to place in one of my inquiry tools to find out what others think of this statement. Surely dance provides students with some important skills which enable them to learn effectively and subsequently showing that dance can provide transferable skills?
'interdisciplinary understanding involves the "integration of knowledge and modes of thinking from two or more disciplines in order to create products, solve problems, and offer explanations of the world in ways that would not have been possible through single disciplinary means." (Boix Mansilla, Gardner, 2000)'.
As dance is classed as part of the Performing Arts, it has made me consider whether those who teach within the Performing Arts in education believe that this statement applies within this broad discipline. Can two or more disciplines of Performing Arts; for example, Dance and Drama, 'create products, solve problems and offer explanations'? From my point of view I would say yes, however this may be a bias view from someone who has intensely worked within performing arts.
Conclusion
As dance isn't seen as a compulsory subject (National Curriculum, 2013), it does make sense to me that it is sometimes introduced as a subject to perhaps enhance learning of other subjects. Currently the National Curriculum for KS1 and KS2, only has reference to dance under the 'Physical Education Programme of Study', where it states that 'pupils should be taught to perform dances using a range of simple/range of movement patterns'. To me this comes across as very vague and doesn't seem to enforce the idea of dance.
What I do find interesting is that the rest of the criteria for this subject content, refers to what should be achieved by use of other sports. When in fact, dance can teach students balance, agility and co-ordination, which are mainly seen as fundamental skills learnt in common sports activities. It is clear that Rhodes believes in Dance as an interdisciplinary subject and so it seems that this is how Dance, if used at all, is sometimes explored within education. And so I question whether the idea of transferable skills is not really explored within Dance but the use of interdisciplinary learning appears to be supported.
References:
Boix Mansilla V, Gardner H (2000) On Disciplinary Lenses and Interdisciplinary Work, In: Wineburg S, Grossman P (eds): Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Challenges to Implementation. New York: Teachers College Press
Hanna, J. (1999) Partnering Dance and Education: Intelligent Moves for Changing, Interdisciplinary Learning, United States: Human Kinetics
National Curriculum KS1 & KS2 (2013):
Repko AF (2012) Chapter 1: Defining Interdisciplinary Studies, Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory (2nd ed). p16. United States: Sage Publications Ltd.
Rhodes. A.M (2006) Journal of Dance Education: Dance in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning, Volume 6 Issue 2, p48, London:Routledge