The concepts detailed in Reader 3 (Middlesex University, 2014), were not something I was aware of but have come across in my professional practise. Looking into these has made me think how I have used these within my current networking and how they can apply to my future networking.
Concepts of the Professional Network
Cooperation
Cooperation and Game Theory were at first quite hard aspects for me to absorb. Although the idea of cooperation is certainly one in which I come across in my everyday life, the depth in which it can be used as a strategy were not familiar to me.
Axelrod, a researcher into the concept of cooperation, asked the question 'Should a friend keep providing favors to another friend who never reciprocates'. (Axelrod, 1984) (1).
I cant say that I have come across this situation, but I am aware that this does happen in the performing world. The knowledge of an audition can be like gold dust. If only a limited amount of people know the details of an upcoming audition, then you are essentially giving yourself less competition and therefore a better chance of being noticed. I have a very close group of friends and within this network in the past we would share information on upcoming auditions that we had the knowledge of. This was a 'tit for tat' strategy of cooperation which we all used.
Axelrod realised that this was a common approach after setting up players in games of the Prisoner's Dilemma. I tried the game for myself using a variety of strategies to see the effect, and sure enough the mutual use of cooperation seemed to be very effective.
Cooperation could be a useful networking tool to enable an exchange in information to help open new doors. I don't like to think of this as a tactic or strategy but more of a mutual form of help and direction.
Concepts of the Professional Network
Cooperation
Cooperation and Game Theory were at first quite hard aspects for me to absorb. Although the idea of cooperation is certainly one in which I come across in my everyday life, the depth in which it can be used as a strategy were not familiar to me.
Axelrod, a researcher into the concept of cooperation, asked the question 'Should a friend keep providing favors to another friend who never reciprocates'. (Axelrod, 1984) (1).
I cant say that I have come across this situation, but I am aware that this does happen in the performing world. The knowledge of an audition can be like gold dust. If only a limited amount of people know the details of an upcoming audition, then you are essentially giving yourself less competition and therefore a better chance of being noticed. I have a very close group of friends and within this network in the past we would share information on upcoming auditions that we had the knowledge of. This was a 'tit for tat' strategy of cooperation which we all used.
Axelrod realised that this was a common approach after setting up players in games of the Prisoner's Dilemma. I tried the game for myself using a variety of strategies to see the effect, and sure enough the mutual use of cooperation seemed to be very effective.
Cooperation could be a useful networking tool to enable an exchange in information to help open new doors. I don't like to think of this as a tactic or strategy but more of a mutual form of help and direction.
Affiliation
I have certainly used the concept of affiliation within my practice and can now identify that this is a common way to create new networks.
The world of performing and teaching is very social. You are constantly surrounded by people and some of those you naturally affiliate with, possibly because you have mutual interests or even to relieve a situation in knowing you have someone to talk to.
It is only with a growing confidence and consistency of being exposed into social situations that I have found the use of affiliation to be that of a common one.
Affiliation can be a provider of a 'network of support that will help us when we are in need'. (Crisp & Turner, 2007)(2) This can be seen as just one of the desires to create such an affiliation with individuals.
Social Constructionism
The idea of constructionism is that by use of networking and interaction with others we can 'construct' meanings. We do not discover these meanings but by sharing experiences and knowledge we can create our own understanding of the world.
Michael Crotty looked at writers who pointed out that within the world an 'actual meaning emerges only when the consciousness engages with them' (Crotty,M 2005)(3). In this sense relating to networking it is the conscious effort to socialise with others that will create a meaning to be understood.
It is by the way that we 'engage' with the world that constructs these meanings according to the theory of constructionism.
I find this theory particularly hard to grasp and although I can see links to the idea of networking, I am still unsure as to how relevant it may be for me, especially in terms of progressing. Surely if you are networking, then the idea of constructionism is an unconscious result of that?
Connectivism
Networking to me is all about a way of connecting to learn. Connectivism is the theory of this and suggests how we can use the knowledge we have gained from connections based on the knowledge that we already have.
'Within social networks, hubs are well-connected people who are able to foster and maintain knowledge flow' (Siemans,G 2004) (4)
As previously mentioned one form of networking that I have used has been Facebook groups. One group in particular is described as the 'Dance Teachers Hub', and this group allows a variety of dance teachers of different organisations, backgrounds and styles to constantly add and supply knowledge to each other.
'The starting point of connectivism is the individual. Personal knowledge is comprised of a network, which feeds into organizations and institutions, which in turn feed back into the network, and then continue to provide learning to individual. This cycle of knowledge development (personal to network to organization) allows learners to remain current in their field through the connections they have formed.' (Siemans,G 2004)
Everyone has their own level of knowledge which almost works as an ever-growing pool of information. The networking formats that I currently use allow me to stay fresh and updated with relevant information in order to deliver a sound level of practice.
Communities of Practice
'A community of practice is a set of relations among persons, activity, and world, over time and in relation with other tangential and overlapping communities of practice. A community of practice is an intrinsic condition for the existence of knowledge...' (Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne, 1991)(5)
In terms of networking this is one of my most preferred methods of learning. I would describe one type of community I belong to as a practical engagement with others. As a dancer and teacher I have spent most of my educated life as a practical learner. This in turn has become a poular way for me to network.
Myself and a group of dancers who are still working along with others who are now teaching have a regular dance class set up by a previous colleague I have worked with. This type of community allows us to share choreographic ideas, information on auditions and possible cover for teaching classes. Without this community of practice, we would have one less form of networking.
REFERENCES
1. Axelrod,R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Preface. London: Penguin
2. Crisp,J & Turner,R (2007) Essential Social Psychology (2nd Ed). Affiliation and Attraction. London: Sage
3. Crotty,M (2005) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Constructionism: the making of meaning. London: Sage
4. Siemans,G (2004) Connectivism: A Learning Theaory for the Digital Age
http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm (Accessed 2 December 2014)
5. Lave, Jean and Wenger, Etienne (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Chapter 4: Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. Cambridge University Press








